How To Argue Like A Scientist At Holiday Dinner: A Cosmic Perspective from Neil deGrasse Tyson

Summary

The holiday season in the US is often a time for family gatherings and dinners, but these conversations can quickly turn into verbal combat with guests expressing their views as unassailable truths. Scientists, however, approach disagreements differently, seeking to evaluate all sides and waiting for more or better data to arrive before deciding on an outcome. In a podcast episode titled "How To Argue Like A Scientist At Holiday Dinner: A Cosmic Perspective" from Neil deGrasse Tyson, the author provides examples of calm and rational analysis to help inform opinions and expose unfounded perspectives.

One example given is the question of whether people who claim to love all animals would lead a movement to protect ticks and fleas. This thought experiment highlights the fact that even those who claim to love all animals still have limits and biases in their thinking. By questioning these biases and examining them rationally, we can gain a better understanding of our own perspectives and those of others.

Another example provided is the question of whether liberals can claim the high ground when it comes to embracing science given their rejection of mainstream science on topics such as vaccines and GMOs. This example shows that even those who claim to be pro-science can still hold unfounded beliefs or reject mainstream scientific consensus. By examining these beliefs and questioning their validity, we can gain a better understanding of the scientific evidence and make more informed decisions.

Ultimately, the podcast argues that an infusion of science and rational thinking can help to inform opinions and expose unfounded perspectives, leading to more productive conversations and fewer disagreements. By approaching disagreements with a scientific mindset and a willingness to examine all sides of an issue, we can gain a better understanding of the world around us and make more informed decisions.